[wxqc] [personal] Re: What's the significance?

[Jim Pace]

Thanks, Russ. I am now seeing my station on the two lists.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Russell.B.Chadwick at noaa.gov>
To: "Discussion of weather data quality issues" 
<wxqc at lists.gladstonefamily.net>
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2008 11:44 AM
Subject: [personal] Re: [wxqc] What's the significance?


> Hi Jim,
>
> You (and another CW person) are on this list,
>
> http://wxqa.com/expt/C20080302.txt
>
> At the top of each hour, I partition all the received packets into eight
> bins, depending on the symbol after the :
>
> :@    activecwd (CWxxxx with :@)
> :@    activedwd (DWxxxx with :@)
> :@    activeham (all other with :@)
> :$    dollar
> :_    unders
> :=    equal
> :!    expt
> else  other
>
> Only the first 5 have an index of the past ten days, but all eight have
> at least the past ten days on the wxqa.com web site.  I will look into
> getting the CW packets that aren't :@ back into the last packet heard
> list.  Sounds easy, but I have learned that things that sound easy
> aren't necessarily so!
>
> Russ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jim Pace <unkajim at comcast.net>
> Date: Sunday, March 2, 2008 6:08 pm
> Subject: [wxqc] What's the significance?
>
>> In the early part of February, I modified my weather software to no
>> longer
>> add the client timestamp to the outgoing CWOP post since it seemed
>> pointless
>> to have it in there. In its place, I added an "!", then later the
>> "=" and
>> now back to the "!". Here's a recently sent string:
>> CW0825>APRS,TCPXX*,qAX,CWOP-
>> 3:!4423.74N/12242.13W_067/002g004t050r000p028P000h67b10354JavaOWW
>> 1.0
>>
>> It looks like a consequence of this is that my station no longer
>> shows in
>> this list: http://www.wxqa.com/activecwd/C20080302.txt and February
>> the 11th
>> was the last time it is shown on the last packet sent list here:
>> http://www.wxqa.com/lastpkt_reg.txt .
>>
>> The data shows normally on Findu and I continue to get quality
>> feedback
>> emails so it appears all is OK except for these two lists. Would
>> the lack of
>> the timestamp be the reason for omission from these two?
>>
>> Jim CW0825
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wxqc mailing list
>> Post messages to wxqc at lists.gladstonefamily.net
>> To unsubcribe or change delivery options, please go to:
>> http://server.gladstonefamily.net/mailman/listinfo/wxqc
>>
>> The contents of this message are the responsibility of the author.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> wxqc mailing list
> Post messages to wxqc at lists.gladstonefamily.net
> To unsubcribe or change delivery options, please go to:
> http://server.gladstonefamily.net/mailman/listinfo/wxqc
>
> The contents of this message are the responsibility of the author.