[wxqc] starting again

Victor Engel brillig at gmail.com
Wed Mar 5 12:03:13 CST 2008


On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Keith Miller <kdmiller at oldsgmail.com> wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
>  > From: wxqc-bounces at lists.gladstonefamily.net
>  > [mailto:wxqc-bounces at lists.gladstonefamily.net]On Behalf Of
>  > Victor Engel
>  > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 10:25 AM
>  > To: Discussion of weather data quality issues
>  > Subject: Re: [wxqc] starting again
>  >
>  >
>
>  > I had a question about this some time before, but I haven't
>  > done any experimentation, so I don't know the answer. If
>  > using a wireless system, the transmitter that the anemometer
>  > uses has extra plugs for other equipment. It seems to me the
>  > radiation and UV sensors could be plugged in there. I'd love
>  > it if this worked, but as I said, I haven't tried it. If
>  > anyone has tried it or knows for sure whether or not it
>  > would work, let me know.
>  >
>
>  The reports I've seen from those who have tried, is that it
>  doesn't work, unless you configure the anemometer transmitter
>  as an ISS at the console. But that defeats the purpose. It's
>  only because of firmware because the transmitters for all
>  stations is the same part. Do like I've done and make the
>  suggestion to Davis that this would be a desirable option.
>  Maybe if it's suggested enough, they'll make it possible.
>
>

So if I'm following, you'd then have two ISS's, which would be
possible if each were on its own channel. Correct?


More information about the wxqc mailing list