[wxqc] starting again
Victor Engel
brillig at gmail.com
Wed Mar 5 12:03:13 CST 2008
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Keith Miller <kdmiller at oldsgmail.com> wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: wxqc-bounces at lists.gladstonefamily.net
> > [mailto:wxqc-bounces at lists.gladstonefamily.net]On Behalf Of
> > Victor Engel
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 10:25 AM
> > To: Discussion of weather data quality issues
> > Subject: Re: [wxqc] starting again
> >
> >
>
> > I had a question about this some time before, but I haven't
> > done any experimentation, so I don't know the answer. If
> > using a wireless system, the transmitter that the anemometer
> > uses has extra plugs for other equipment. It seems to me the
> > radiation and UV sensors could be plugged in there. I'd love
> > it if this worked, but as I said, I haven't tried it. If
> > anyone has tried it or knows for sure whether or not it
> > would work, let me know.
> >
>
> The reports I've seen from those who have tried, is that it
> doesn't work, unless you configure the anemometer transmitter
> as an ISS at the console. But that defeats the purpose. It's
> only because of firmware because the transmitters for all
> stations is the same part. Do like I've done and make the
> suggestion to Davis that this would be a desirable option.
> Maybe if it's suggested enough, they'll make it possible.
>
>
So if I'm following, you'd then have two ISS's, which would be
possible if each were on its own channel. Correct?
More information about the wxqc
mailing list