[wxqc] Errant Station Data

Dave Helms dshelms at comcast.net
Thu Mar 1 20:27:12 CST 2007


Hi John,

The analysis for your station's location looks reasonably stable for the 
last couple days:
http://weather.gladstonefamily.net/site/C6611

Hard to say what station is making the dew point analysis a bit 
squirely.... oops found it:
http://weather.gladstonefamily.net/qchart/C6611?date=20070301&addnl=KNXX&addnl=KLOM&Add+to+charts=Add+to+charts&.cgifields=addnl

Willow Grove Naval Air Station's (KNXX) temperature!  I guess the KNXX's 
anomalously high temperature is causing the analysis RH to be 
erroroneously too low.  Bad Navy Aerographers!  The observer must have 
been sipping the groge during sling psychrometer class.  Actually, the 
base is getting BRAC's and services outsourced.  Maybe you can gove a 
call to the base operator and ask for the weather station to alert them 
of the problem?

Answering your question, MADIS staff can remove a station from the 
analysis if it is non-CWOP, or we can play data police (as I was 
recently accused of) and put a CWOP station on the "unvalidated" list if 
repairs are not planned.  Putting active CWOP stations on the inactive 
list of done as a last result.

DaveH
CW0351

JOHN HARKNESS wrote:

> What do you do if a station is constantly causing neighboring stations 
> to show bad data in the quality reports?  I know it is being a little 
> picky!! But when it throws your analysis of so bad, do they 
> temporarily remove that station from the mix?  I was just 
> curious....All my readings are very close to other stations, but I 
> thought I had a problem until I did some investigating. 
>  
> john
>  
> cw6611
>  
> kpahorsh1
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>wxqc mailing list
>Post messages to wxqc at lists.gladstonefamily.net
>To unsubcribe or change delivery options, please go to:
>http://server.gladstonefamily.net/mailman/listinfo/wxqc
>
>The contents of this message are the responsibility of the author.
>



More information about the wxqc mailing list