[wxqc] Data Quality

[Chris Flory]

Thanks everyone for the discussion, I have a better understanding now.  And
I guess my weather station is doing a pretty good job :)

One other question, I remember setting myself up to receive those emails,
but I have yet to receive any.  

Should I try it again, or am I bouncing the emails as you related to?

Thanks!

-----Original Message-----
From: wxqc-bounces at lists.gladstonefamily.net
[mailto:wxqc-bounces at lists.gladstonefamily.net] On Behalf Of Philip
Gladstone
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 2:25 PM
To: Discussion of weather data quality issues
Subject: Re: [wxqc] Data Quality

Bob,

You only get the daily emails if one or more samples fails QC. However, 
you should still get weekly summaries in any event. If you fail QC 
again, then you should start getting emails daily. There are long stops 
against people whose email accounts stop accepting emails, but these 
require of the order of 30 consecutive bounces to trigger.

However, this question does come up occasionally -- and I'm open to 
changing the way that it works. Also, maybe more importantly, the format 
  of the messages is hard for people to understand (especially the text 
emails as opposed to the html version). This is partly because of the 
limited line length (to prevent word wrapping from messing up the 
formatting).

I'm open to ideas on how to redo these emails to make them more user 
friendly -- if anybody has any concrete ideas, then please try and 
mock-up the email that you would like to see, and send it to me 
off-list. I'll try and come up with a better format and then send it out 
for critique.

Philip

Bob Rathke wrote:
> So you are automatically removed if your data is "GREEN"? 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wxqc-bounces at lists.gladstonefamily.net
> [mailto:wxqc-bounces at lists.gladstonefamily.net] On Behalf Of Evan
> Bookbinder
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 10:12 AM
> To: Discussion of weather data quality issues
> Subject: Re: [wxqc] Data Quality
> 
> I  *think* that's a good thing Chris. It means that all your data
> variables are within tolerance.
> 
> Evan
> 
> 
> 
> Chris Flory wrote:
>> No longer seeing my info in the APRSWXNET DAILY QUALITY CONTROL 
>> MESSAGE
>>
>> http://www.wxqa.com/qcmsday/DQC20061010.txt
>>
>> Any ideas??
>>
>> TIA!
>>
>> -Chris Flory
>> CW6489
>>   
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wxqc mailing list
>> Post messages to wxqc at lists.gladstonefamily.net To unsubcribe or 
>> change delivery options, please go to:
>> http://server.gladstonefamily.net/mailman/listinfo/wxqc
>>
>> The contents of this message are the responsibility of the author.
> _______________________________________________
> wxqc mailing list
> Post messages to wxqc at lists.gladstonefamily.net To unsubcribe or change
> delivery options, please go to:
> http://server.gladstonefamily.net/mailman/listinfo/wxqc
> 
> The contents of this message are the responsibility of the author.
> _______________________________________________
> wxqc mailing list
> Post messages to wxqc at lists.gladstonefamily.net
> To unsubcribe or change delivery options, please go to:
> http://server.gladstonefamily.net/mailman/listinfo/wxqc
> 
> The contents of this message are the responsibility of the author.
> 
>