[wxqc] FW: Weather data quality report for 2006-11-01 - cw6551

Dave Helms dshelms at comcast.net
Thu Nov 2 19:23:31 CST 2006


Hi Bob,

The MADIS QCMS statistics show your station has virtually perfect 
performance, e.g., 0 (zero) questionable reports of a total 94 reports 
for altimeter (pressure), potential temperature, wind speed, and wind 
direction, with 3 questionable (not not necessarily bad) dew point 
reports. 

On your Quality Monitoring page you have all green checks and double 
thumbs up.  So, the QC statistics almost always consider your data to be 
in great shape.  The two station you list look good too, except their 
pressures are off a bit. 

If you want to say 'howdy' to your neighbors, you will find their email 
addresses on you state CWOP page, http://www.wxqa.com/states/NY.html. 
Folks can be sensitive about criticism, so we always encourage members 
to use maximum diplomacy when making suggestions to fellow members.

Regards,

Dave
CW0351


Bob Rathke wrote:

> Hi folks,
>  
> New guy here. I have been getting "dinged" the last few days. I think 
> my data is correct. It looks like a couple of "bad" stations in the 
> area are throwing off the curve. I have not been able to locate an 
> email address for the station owners to see if they can correct.
>  
> Any Advice would be appreciated!
>  
> Thanks!
>  
> My Station:cw6551
>  
> Misreading stations:
> co736
> c1370
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Weather Quality [mailto:weather-qc at nospam.gladstonefamily.net]
> *Sent:* Wed 11/1/2006 9:21 PM
> *To:* Bob Rathke
> *Subject:* Weather data quality report for 2006-11-01
>
>    DATE     UTC      SITE  *   ALT    * POT TEMP *  DEW PNT *    DD    
> *    FF   
>                            *   (MB)   *  (DEG F) *  (DEG F) *   (DEG)  
> *   (KNT) 
> 01-NOV-2006 Errs    CW6551 *   0/94   *   0/94   *   3/94   *   0/94   
> *   0/94  
>
> Note that times are in UTC. The values displayed are  'Observed (error)'
> The error value is 'analysis - observed'. I.e. if your observed value 
> is higher
> than the computed value, then the error will be negative. You have to 
> pick out
> the reading that is in error. The row with the time of 'Smry' is a 
> daily summary
> and the data is  'mean(standard deviation)' for each observation 
> during that day.
>
> Graphs: http://weather.gladstonefamily.net/qchart/C6551?date=20061102
>
> For more information about quality checking, then visit 
> http://www.wxqa.com/
> To discuss, sign up to WXQC at 
> http://weather.gladstonefamily.net/mailman/listinfo/wxqc
>
> To receive these emails in HTML, just click the link
> http://weather.gladstonefamily.net/cgi-bin/weather-qc.pl?act=html&pwd=3c37f7a6a9 
> <http://weather.gladstonefamily.net/cgi-bin/weather-qc.pl?act=html&pwd=3c37f7a6a9>
>
> To stop this email, just click the link
> http://weather.gladstonefamily.net/cgi-bin/weather-qc.pl?act=unsub&pwd=3c37f7a6a9 
> <http://weather.gladstonefamily.net/cgi-bin/weather-qc.pl?act=unsub&pwd=3c37f7a6a9>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>wxqc mailing list
>Post messages to wxqc at lists.gladstonefamily.net
>To unsubcribe or change delivery options, please go to:
>http://server.gladstonefamily.net/mailman/listinfo/wxqc
>
>The contents of this message are the responsibility of the author.
>



More information about the wxqc mailing list