[wxqc] Rainfall Reporting from Weatherlink
Dennis Maier
ddmaier at gmail.com
Tue Mar 14 12:27:13 EST 2006
I'm getting more and more disappointed in WeatherLink, primarily the "Upload
Progress" window now that I'm uploading every 5 minutes, but because of some
of the items mentioned below. However I do like the quick response to the
changing weather data.
What are good software alternatives to WeatherLink (hope its ok to ask on
this forum) for the Davis Vantage Pro?
Dennis Maier
CW4869
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wxqc-bounces at lists.gladstonefamily.net
> [mailto:wxqc-bounces at lists.gladstonefamily.net] On Behalf Of
> dshelms at comcast.net
> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 11:49 AM
> To: Discussion of weather data quality issues; Discussion of
> weather data quality issues
> Cc: James.Dudley at noaa.gov
> Subject: Re: [wxqc] Rainfall Reporting from Weatherlink
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Davis says they will support 1 hour and 24 hour precip
> reporting for the VP systems. I not sure about the WMII support.
>
> Dave
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: James.Dudley at noaa.gov
> > Dave,
> >
> > I'm not sure if I heard this from the group or not. Is
> Davis planning
> > any updates to Weatherlink precipitation reporting. Currently, the
> > precipitation reported by Weatherlink to APRS/CWOP is a
> running total
> > from midnight to midnight and it only updates once an hour. I have
> > noticed that other software updates at more frequent intervals. Is
> > Davis working on something?
> >
> > Jim Dudley
> > CW2553 Hanford Ca
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > wxqc mailing list
> > wxqc at lists.gladstonefamily.net
> > http://pond1.gladstonefamily.net:8080/mailman/listinfo/wxqc
> >
> > The contents of this message are the responsibility of the author.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wxqc mailing list
> wxqc at lists.gladstonefamily.net
> http://pond1.gladstonefamily.net:8080/mailman/listinfo/wxqc
>
> The contents of this message are the responsibility of the author.
>
More information about the wxqc
mailing list