[wxqc] Fw: your CWOP data

[Victor Engel]

I see that KUIL is nearby and also has a red X for data that at first glance
seems similar to yours. Is MADIS deceived by coastal gradients, I wonder?

On 7/18/06, Marion C. Maher <msmaher at centurytel.net> wrote:
>
>  I wanted to pass this along, and ask for your response.  I have relocated
> my sensor in the best place it can possibly be for my location and
> conditions.  Is there anything else I can do to make sure I have good
> quality data?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marion
> CW5915
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- *From:* Mark Albright <albrightm at comcast.net>
> *To:* msmaher at centurytel.net
> *Sent:* Monday, July 17, 2006 11:01 PM
> *Subject:* your CWOP data
>
>
> Hi Marion,
>
> I saw your inquiry of 1 July on wxqc.  I have looked at your data over the
> past few days and find your temperature data to be fine, in spite of the big
> red X on the quality control page.  Your data is plotted on our northwest
> Washington surface maps.  For instance:
>
> http://www.atmos.washington.edu/images/sfcplots-nwwa/2006071800.gif
>
> Thanks for making your data available to the meteorological community.
>
> Mark Albright
> Atmospheric Sciences
> Univ of Washington
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wxqc mailing list
> wxqc at lists.gladstonefamily.net
> http://pond1.gladstonefamily.net:8080/mailman/listinfo/wxqc
>
> The contents of this message are the responsibility of the author.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://pond1.gladstonefamily.net:8080/pipermail/wxqc/attachments/20060718/9f6c567d/attachment.html