[wxqc] Calibrating anemometers
Victor Engel
brillig at gmail.com
Sun Jul 9 14:48:55 EDT 2006
After preliminary data analysis, it seems my initial impressions may have
been faulty. Here are the results of my analysis.
In this first report, I list mean DIFSPEED (my neighbor's reported speed
minus my reported speed) for each of the coded directions. Apparently, my
wind readings are actually higher than his. Units are miles per hour.
DIFSPEED WindDirection
-1.46 North
-.36 NNE
-.37 NE
-.33 ENE
-.69 East
-.16 ESE
-1.17 SE
-1.01 SSE
-.84 South
-.33 SSW
-.37 SW
-.91 WSW
-1.17 West
.13 WNW
-1.16 NW
-.29 NNW
-.70 AVERAGE
On the other hand, his speeds are higher for wind gust data. I think that is
where I got the impression his readings were higher.
1.83 North
1.57 NNE
1.55 NE
1.38 ENE
1.69 East
1.72 ESE
1.03 SE
1.49 SSE
1.47 South
1.49 SSW
1.59 SW
.35 WSW
-.04 West
.40 WNW
1.79 NW
1.82 NNW
1.47 AVERAGE
Finally, here is a count of total data points used for these statistics.
North 83
NNE 96
NE 119
ENE 176
East 166
ESE 98
SE 147
SSE 270
South 169
SSW 45
SW 46
WSW 34
West 23
WNW 15
NW 43
NNW 99
TOTAL 1629
Something that probably skews the top chart a little bit is that I only
selected data for which windspeed was nonzero at my station. Here is the
procedure I used:
I downloaded all weatherunderground data (CSV charts) for our two weather
stations over the period of time my station has been active. Since the times
are sometimes every minute and sometimes every five minutes, I took only the
first data points on or after 5 minute boundaries. Then, I selected only
data for which both stations had values for the timeframe.
I wonder if my setup is missing wind gusts for some reason or other. If the
Davis WIND station itself does not keep track of gusts, then gusts would
have to be captured by software, and gaps between readings could possibly
miss gusts.
Victor
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://pond1.gladstonefamily.net:8080/pipermail/wxqc/attachments/20060709/8c7ad1f5/attachment.html
More information about the wxqc
mailing list