[wxqc] Dewpoints for CW5204.. LaCrosse WS-2310
dshelms at comcast.net
dshelms at comcast.net
Thu Feb 2 10:18:41 EST 2006
Hi John,
Your data looks fine as compared to KMRB and other CWOPers (even GaryO):
http://weather.gladstonefamily.net/qchart/C5204?date=20060202&addnl=KMRB&addnl=C0146&addnl=C1672&addnl=C4571&Add+to+charts=Add+to+charts&.cgifields=addnl
There is probably some "unseen" WeatherBug station close to you that is causing the humidity flakiness. I would not recommend any adjustments as your data is good. Also, we usually encourage people to build up a month or more of station QCMS statistics before attempting to judge sensor performance.
Dave
CW0351
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Sam Drinkard <sam at wa4phy.net>
> jdkuhn at adelphia.net wrote:
>
> >I'm wondering if there's something wrong with my RH sensor (Davis Pro 2 only 3
> weeks old) or if I should adjust it upwards. The dewpoints correspond fairly
> good with surrounding stations (KMRB, C0146, c1672) but my RH seems to be my
> issue. The analysis for the Dewpoint yesterday seems weird. It jumps from 20
> to 25 around 1600. Looking at the last severl days shows that the analysis of
> RH is 10 to 15 % off most of the time.
> >
> >http://weather.gladstonefamily.net/site/C5204?tile=10;days=3#Data
> >
> >
> >Any thoughts on what to do? Should I adjust the RH upwards?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >John
> >CW5204
> >
> >
> John,
>
> Aside from your spikes, there are a couple of other stations you are
> being compared with (I suspect) and the few I looked at have a bad case
> of the jaggies, however Dave or Mike might be able to find more info
> than is from Phil's website. Definately something flakey..
>
> Sam
> _______________________________________________
> wxqc mailing list
> wxqc at lists.gladstonefamily.net
> http://pond1.gladstonefamily.net:8080/mailman/listinfo/wxqc
>
> The contents of this message are the responsibility of the author.
More information about the wxqc
mailing list